• Slide Image 1 Title | Welcome to D5 Smartia Theme, Visit D5 Creation for Details

    You can use D5 Smartia for Black and White looking Smart Blogging, Personal or Corporate Websites. This is a Sample Description and you can change these from Samrtia Options
  • Slide Image 2 Title | Welcome to D5 Smartia Theme, Visit D5 Creation for Details

    You can use D5 Smartia for Black and White looking Smart Blogging, Personal or Corporate Websites. This is a Sample Description and you can change these from Samrtia Options
  • Slide Image 3 Title | Welcome to D5 Smartia Theme, Visit D5 Creation for Details

    You can use D5 Smartia for Black and White looking Smart Blogging, Personal or Corporate Websites. This is a Sample Description and you can change these from Samrtia Options

悦来香吧

now browsing by tag

 
 
Posted by: | Posted on: March 2, 2021

Phish Shares Full Stream Of New Studio Album, “Big Boat” [Listen]

first_imgWith their new album due out on October 7th, beloved jam band Phish has shared a full stream of their new release through the NPR First Listen program. Titled Big Boat, the new release features thirteen original tracks and was produced by Bob Ezrin.Of the songs that made the album, there are a number of some familiar tunes like “Blaze On” and “No Men In No Man’s Land.” There are a few songs on the album that were debuted in 2016, like the Jon Fishman sung “Friends” and the Trey Anastasio ballad “Miss You.” There are also a few brand new cuts, like “I Always Wanted It This Way,” “Running Out Of Time,” “Home” and “More.” The album ends with the 13-minute “Petrichor,” which was originally written as an orchestral piece and ultimately scaled back for Phish, though the band has yet to play it live.Though some fans got to listen to the album last week when it leaked, the NPR Music stream is the first full-length official taste of this new release. Stream it below and let us know what you think!Big Boat Tracklisting1. Friends (3:42) (Fishman)2. Breath and Burning (4:20) (Anastasio)3. Home (6:26) (McConnell)4. Blaze On (4:20) (Anastasio/Marshall)5. Tide Turns (4:21) (Anastasio)6. Things People Do (1:54) (McConnell)7. Waking Up Dead (4:15) (Gordon/Murawski)8. Running out of Time (3:32) (Anastasio/Marshall)9. No Men in No Man’s Land (4:59) (Anastasio/Marshall)10. Miss You (7:01) (Anastasio)11. I Always Wanted It This Way (4:29) (McConnell)12. More (4:22) (Anastasio)13. Petrichor (13:22) (Anastasio)last_img read more

Posted by: | Posted on: December 19, 2020

September 15, 2004 Notices

first_img September 15, 2004 LAWS Notices September 15, 2004 Notices Notices Third DCA judgeship available Notice is hereby given to all interested persons and groups of three vacancies of judicial office on the Third District Court of Appeal.The Third District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission is actively seeking applicants for these three positions.All persons who desire to be considered must submit a background statement in substantial compliance with The Florida Bar application. All applicants must also submit waivers of confidentiality of all materials necessary to adequately investigate each applicant.Applicants must be a resident within the Third District, a registered voter, and have been a member in good standing of the Florida Bar for the preceding 10 years.Applications may be requested from the office of Thomas R. Spencer, JNC chair, Monday through Friday between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. or they may be downloaded from The Florida Bar Web site at www.flabar.org in the section titled “Bar Forms and Applications.”All applications must be submitted in the form of an original with nine copies and must be filed no later than 5 p.m. September 30,2004 at the office Chair Thomas R. Spencer, Spencer & Klein, P.A., 2 Alhambra Plaza, Penthouse 2-B, Coral Gables 33134, telephone (305) 446-5711, fax (305) 446-5523, e-mail [email protected] First DCA judgeship availableApplications are being sought to fill a vacancy on the First District Court of Appeal created by the retirement of Judge Anne C. Booth, effective January 3, 2005.Applications will be screened by the First District Court of Appeal Judicial Nominating Commission, who will send nominees to the governor. The governor then has 60 days from the receipt of the nominees to make the appointment.Applicants must be a resident within the First District, a registered voter, and have been a member in good standing of The Florida Bar for the preceding 10 years. Application forms are available on The Florida Bar’s Web site at www.flabar.org or by calling Jeanne M. Miller, JNC chair, at (904) 630-1540.Ten copies of the completed application must be returned to Miller at 220 East Bay Street, 14th Floor, Jacksonville 32202, no later than 5 p.m. on October 7. Interviews are tentatively set for the week of October 18th or October 25th in Tallahassee. NoticePursuant to Standing Board Policy 1.60, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar hereby publishes this notice of intent to consider or take final action at its October 15 meeting on the following items. These matters are additionally governed by Rule 1-12.1, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, where applicable.Most amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar that are finally acted upon by the board must still be formally presented to the Supreme Court of Florida, with further notice and opportunity to be heard, before they are officially approved and become effective. To receive a full copy of the text of any of these proposed amendments call (850)561-5751 – please reference any requested proposal by its title or item number and date of this publication. RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR Chapter 4 Rules of Professional Conduct Subchapter 4-1 1. Rule 4-1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited and Other Transactions Summary: Within subdivision (h), prohibits lawyers from making arrangements that prospectively limit liability for malpractice without first advising the affected person in writing of the opportunities of independent representation. Subchapter 4-8 Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession 2. Rule 4-8.6 Authorized Business Entities Summary: Within subdivisions (b) – (g) and comment, adds “proprietor” and “proprietor of a solo practice” to those business entities in which lawyers are authorized to practice law. Chapter 6 Legal Specialization and Education Programs Subchapter 6-3 Florida Certification Plan 3. Rule 6-3.5 Standards for Certification Summary: Within subdivison (d), adds language in (1) to require substantial involvement in a “particular area” of law instead of the general term “practice” of law; adds new language in new subdivision within (5) to allow certification without examination in limited circumstances as permitted by individual area standards. Chapter 10 Rules Governing the Investigation and Prosecution of the Unlicensed Practice of Law Subchapter 10-6 Procedures for Investigation 4. Rule 10-6.1 Hearings Summary: Revises title to read “Taking of Testimony” instead of “Hearings”; within subdivision (a), similarly revises reference to when hearings are held, to read when “testimony is taken”; and, within subdivision (d), additionally revises references to a complainant’s right to be present at any circuit UPL committee “proceeding” rather than “hearing”, further clarified to be when the respondent is present before the committee to give testimony. Subchapter 10-8 Confidentiality 5. Rule 10-8.1 Files Summary: Consistent with proposed revisions to rule 10-6.1, adds “transcribed testimony” to the definitions of the record for UPL and circuit committee purposes. STANDING BOARD POLICIES 600 Series – Continuing Legal Education Subchapter 6.20 Authority for CLE Courses 6. Policy 6.21 Division, Section and Committee Programs Summary: Repeals subdivision (d), “Section Certification Review Programs,” which allows sections to provide certification review outside the CLE Committee umbrella. Subchapter 6.30 – Fees for CLE Courses 7. Policy 6.30 Fees for CLE Courses Summary: Amends the base CLE course fee to not less than $105.00 per day, formerly $85.00; amends the surcharge for non-members of cosponsoring section attending bar CLEs to $25.00, formerly $15.00. 8. Policy 6.31 Distribution of Proceeds Summary: Adds new subdivision (a)(1)(B), to allow for the capping of proceeds if the total gross fees for a CLE course, after subtraction of allowable expenses, are less than the percentage share specified in subdivision (a)(1)(A); revises or renumbers existing subdivision entries as necessary to accommodate this new matter. 1500 Series – Lawyer Regulation Policies Subchapter 15.50 Administration and Admonishments 9. Policy 15.55 Deferral of Disciplinary Investigation During Civil or Criminal Proceedings Summary: Adds new language to clarify that bar counsel, with concurrence of the chief branch discipline counsel, may close a civil or criminal discipline file and may decline to reopen the file. Subchapter 15.70 Disciplinary Action on Malpractice/Incompetence 10. Policy 15.75 Policy on Review of Continuing Complaints Summary: New policy, codifying procedures and policies regarding the review of closed inquiries and disciplinary files when further action is requested by a complaining witness or other individual. PROCEDURES 11. Florida Bar Procedures for Ruling on Questions of Ethics and Florida Bar Procedures for Issuing Advisory Opinions Relating to Lawyer Advertising or Solicitation Summary: Amends procedures to reflect the bar’s revised headquarters address. BYLAWS 12. General Practice, Solo, & Small Firm Practitioners Section Summary: Within Article II, ( Membership), adds the definition and term of office for law professor, affiliate members. BLSE POLICIES 500 Series – Course Approval 13. Policy 5.01 Course Approval Administration 14. Policy 5.02 Member Submissions for Course Evaluation and Credit 15. Policy 5.03 Course Approval Standards 16. Policy 5.04 Credit Approval 17. Policy 5.05 Credit for Other CLE Activities 18. Policy 5.06 Complimentary Audiotapes Summary: Throughout the 500 Series, proposes new fee structure for course evaluation; adds other minor adjustments to various policy provisions to specify credit assignments for particular educational activities.last_img read more

Posted by: | Posted on: December 17, 2020

Financial trade groups support AML modernization bill

first_imgTwelve financial groups on January 4th thanked Reps. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) and Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.) for introducing an anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing modernization bill that will help prevent criminals from using shell companies to hide illicit activity.The bill would impose a beneficial ownership reporting requirement on closely held, non-public legal entities and provide financial institutions with access to reported information to help them with their customer due diligence compliance efforts.“Financial institutions should be able to rely on the information reported by businesses to FinCEN, which would, in turn, reduce the reporting burden on those businesses,” the groups said. 22SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblr continue reading »last_img read more

Posted by: | Posted on: September 23, 2020

Argos in Command at GSC Championship

first_img Share Argos in Command at GSC Championship April 22, 2007HOT SPRINGS, Ark. – The fourth ranked West Florida Argonauts have repeat on their mind at the GSC Women’s Golf Championships. The Argonauts are in complete control in the nine team field through 18 holes of the 36 hole championship at the par 72, 5,834 yard Hot Springs Country Club course in Hot Springs, Ark.West Florida has a dominating 25 stroke lead half way through this year’s tournament. The Argos shot a 297 in round one. Arkansas Tech shot a 322 for a second place finish after the first round.Sarah Nicholson hopes to capture the individual title. She is in a good position to medal through 18 holes. She shot a 70, -2 (35-35), which puts her in first place. Nicholson leads teammate Vicky Jackson who shot a 72, E (38-34). Jackson is in second place. Natalia Espinola is fourth with a 77, +5 (37-40). Clara Fornella is in a tie for fifth with a 78, +6 (38-40). Rachel Christ rounds out the UWF roster with an 88, +16 (42-46). She is in 23rd place.The final round gets underway Monday morning. For full results, click on the “Round 1” and “Stats” link on the schedule pagePrint Friendly Versionlast_img read more

Posted by: | Posted on: September 22, 2020

Ighalo equals 95-year Man U record

first_imgRelatedPosts Ighalo: My best moment as ‘Red Devil’ EPL: Crystal Palace stun sloppy Man U EPL: Red Devils attack Palace Odion Ighalo entered the Manchester United record books on Saturday and became only the second player in the club’s history to score in each of his first four competitive starts following his strike in the 2-1 win against Norwich.The Nigerian forward has been a big hit since signing on loan from Chinese side Shanghai Shenhua in January, scoring five goals and creating one assist in all competitions. He has particularly impressed in the cup competitions, and his strikes in his four starts against Club Brugge, Derby, LASK and Norwich see him equal the record set by Jimmy Hanson in 1925, according to Opta.It means Ighalo could break the record in the next game he starts, which could be against Brighton on Tuesday, although he has yet to score in the Premier League.Swedish legend Zlatan Ibrahimovic scored in his first three starts against Leicester, Bournemouth and Southampton in the 2016-17 season, but then failed to score in the 1-0 win over Hull.United boss Ole Gunnar Solskjaer was clearly delighted with Ighalo’s goal against Norwich, which set them on their way to a late victory in extra time.Speaking after the game, he said: “He’s a proven goalscorer and played his part in both goals. He is a great person to have around the dressing room too. “Odion knows how much we value him in and around the dressing room; he’s a goalscorer, a poacher, he’s strong, we can play the ball into him, he showed for the second and Paul [Pogba] found him.”United will discover their opponents for the semi-final of the competition on Sunday evening, and will no doubt fancy their chances of winning their first piece of silverware under Solskjaer given their fine recent form.Tags: Manchester UnitedNorwich CityOdion IghaloShenghai Shenhualast_img read more

Posted by: | Posted on: August 26, 2020

March Madness 2019: Picking Sweet 16 games against the spread

first_imgAuburn is a feast or famine offense, and so far it has feasted like a dinner at Fogo de Chao. The Tigers are 25 of 61 from 3-point range and their 120.4 AdjO this season suggests they score more than the typical No. 5 seed. Yet the Tigers were nearly upset by New Mexico State in the first round and their in-season inconsistency makes it a reach to think they can keep up the scoring pace. There’s one more problem here: Auburn is playing a team that can score with them.North Carolina has scorers aplenty. Cam Johnson is shooting 51 percent from the field and 46 percent from 3. Coby White is averaging 19 points in his last eight games. Luke Maye regularly scores in double figures. Nassir Little averages 10 points per game off the bench. Seriously, there is a reason the Tar Heels were third in the country in points per game. If both offenses are at their best, this might be first to 200 points, but North Carolina’s group is more consistent and more than capable of covering.(All spreads via VegasInsider) If you like drawing with chalk and hate the movie “Cinderella,” you probably loved how the 2019 NCAA Tournament has played out so far. Or something like that. All but two of the top four seeds in each region made the Sweet 16 and every No. 1, 2 and 3 seed is still afloat, making for the chalkiest of chalk tournaments since 2008. There is a legitimate chance that, like 11 years ago, all four No. 1 seeds make the Final Four.  MORE MARCH MADNESS:Ranking every Sweet 16 team’s chance to win it allWhile first- and second-round upsets are exciting and unexpected, ultimately a field made up of the best teams — as is the case this year — will provide more entertaining, evenly-matched games in the Sweet 16 and beyond. This is tougher from a gambling perspective, however. The Sweet 16 doesn’t include a slam-dunk 1 vs. 16 or 2 vs. 15 matchup where it’s easy to see the favorite cover. It’s of a greater importance to look deeper into the matchups before taking your pick against the spread. We had you covered for first round picks against the spread, and five of the eight were correct. Let’s give this another shot for the Sweet 16.MORE: Man with perfect March Madness bracket reveals strategyNo. 1 Virginia (-8.5) vs. No. 12 OregonPrediction: OregonThis isn’t an indictment of the Cavaliers, but rather another warning to ignore the seeding when deciding whether to bet on the Ducks. They have been hot, and if Kemba Walker and the Connecticut Huskies taught us anything in 2011, it’s that being hot can matter in the tournament.Now, that’s not a prediction that the Ducks will go all the way, but the team they were at the beginning of the season isn’t the one they are now. They have won their two NCAA Tournament games by an average of 18.5 points, and their defense — which has been a massive part of their 10-game winning streak — looks as good as ever.While Virginia, with its elite defense and all, is still capable of pulling out a win, it’s not going to be a cakewalk and it may be a stretch to have it as the biggest favorite of any Sweet 16 team. Oregon point guard Payton Pritchard is playing at a high level, with an average of 18.5 points and 7.5 rebounds in his two tournament games, while Kenny Wooten — who has four-plus blocks in each of his last four games — is a defensive force unlike anyone else in the tournament.Feel free to bet on Virginia if you’re taking the money line, but don’t count on them to cover. This one should be a defensive dogfight.MORE: Updated odds to survive Sweet 16, win NCAA TournamentNo. 1 Gonzaga (-7.5) vs. No. 4 Florida StatePrediction: Florida StateThis may be the riskiest pick of the four, because the Bulldogs could come out and throttle the Seminoles and it wouldn’t be that surprising. The Seminoles are tough, though. They most recently proved that on Saturday against Murray State, winning by 22 points in spite of Ja Morant doing, well, Ja Morant things. They have the deepest roster in the tournament with 11 players averaging at least 10 minutes per game and make do without a superstar. While Florida State isn’t one of KenPom’s most efficient offensive or defensive teams left in the tournament, it has five wins over fellow Sweet 16 teams and isn’t likely to be intimidated against Gonzaga.The Bulldogs probably won’t get the same Herculean effort from Brandon Clarke (36 points, eight rebounds, five blocks) as they did in the second round, and are among the worst defensive teams remaining in the tournament. Like with Oregon, don’t necessarily take Florida State on the money line here, but Leonard Hamilton’s teams are usually a tough out in the tournament, so this one could go down to the wire.MORE MARCH MADNESSWhy your team won’t advance to the Final Four No. 2 Michigan (-2) vs. No. 3 Texas TechPrediction: Texas TechFans of defense won’t want to miss this game. It’s a battle of KenPom’s two best. Conversely, neither offense is even in the top 10 among Sweet 16 teams. Those factors have all of the makings of a close game and a potential instant classic. Neither team has had much trouble against their two tournament opponents, with all four combined wins between the two coming by double digits.Although defense will be at the forefront, this game may come down to one player: Jarrett Culver. Simply put, Texas Tech has Culver and Michigan does not. The Wolverines’ biggest issue all season has been their ability to consistently score, and they don’t have a go-to scorer they can always rely on at the end of games.The Red Raiders do. Culver is special, like NBA lottery pick special, and is the best player on the floor in this game. He is averaging 18.8 points, 6.5 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game and has scored 45 points in two tournament contests. Culver can be a difference-maker down the stretch, so the Red Raiders cover. Barely. SN’s 2018-19 AWARDS:Player of the Year | Coach of the Year | All-American teamsNo. 2 Michigan State (-6) vs. No. 3 LSUPrediction: Michigan State will coverThere is only one team outside the ACC that is among the top 10 most efficient offensive and defensive teams in the country: the Spartans. They have overcome injuries to not miss a beat, and disposed of Minnesota in the second round despite Cassius Winston’s lowest scoring output in over almost three weeks. LSU has looked anything but sharp in its two tournament wins and needed a game-winning layup by Tremont Waters to escape Maryland on Saturday.The Tigers, who will once again be coached by assistant Tony Benford, are the worst defensive team left in the tournament and had a rating below the likes of Wichita State, Lipscomb and South Florida, which were all in the NIT or worse. Match that up against the fourth most efficient offensive team in the country that has also won seven straight games, and you’re better off picking the Spartans to cover.No. 1 North Carolina (-5) vs. No. 5 AuburnPrediction: North Carolina will coverlast_img read more