First tier cities early market development opportunitiesPosted by: admin | Posted on: May 10, 2017
China’s early education market through nearly fifteen years of development, has gone through a difficult period of creation, ups and downs of the low tide, difficult climb, fruit harvest…… Gradually embarked on a new path of development. Due to the different scale of urban economic development, residents’ income, residents’ cultural quality, population, geographical characteristics and other objective factors, the decision and influence the development of the early education market.
first location in China, several consecutive years of prices high, so many investors in the site in a dilemma. The rent is right, the location is too remote, the location is right, the cost is too high. If you choose the right location can only increase costs, while the center at sanwubo square meters of the site area requirements is to investors over a few years ago maybe one disaster after another, more than ten million a year rent, to now become a year hundreds of thousands of millions, so investors overwhelmed.
furthermore the education market climate, teachers of the flow of talent has become a norm, center ability, teacher mobility experienced, in recognition of the money for the pro social atmosphere under the influence, who give more money to go to the surface as a no consensus. Critical moment absenteeism, holding the asking price, the importance of their parents as their own salary chips, but also to bring stability to the stability of the factors of teachers. Early Learning Center opened at the same time courses for teachers, the requirements are relatively high, often a teacher who is also the number of courses Professor task, everything is loose, will inevitably lead to teaching problems, parents’ satisfaction will not affect the reputation and development center continued class rate, even the serious influence of early childhood Center survival. But if the increase of manpower, let the teacher in a special department, will lead to more personnel than work available and other undesirable phenomena, so that the center invested in raising people more, obviously is not realistic. In addition, as educators, their ability to improve, >